Poor Rove... looks like he is actually getting caught for something...
Q Does the President stand by his pledge to fire anyone involved in the leak of a name of a CIA operative?
MR. McCLELLAN: Terry, I appreciate your question. I think your question is being asked relating to some reports that are in reference to an ongoing criminal investigation. The criminal investigation that you reference is something that continues at this point. And as I've previously stated, while that investigation is ongoing, the White House is not going to comment on it. The President directed the White House to cooperate fully with the investigation, and as part of cooperating fully with the investigation, we made a decision that we weren't going to comment on it while it is ongoing.
Q Excuse me, but I wasn't actually talking about any investigation. But in June of 2004, the President said that he would fire anybody who was involved in this leak, to press of information. And I just want to know, is that still his position?
"I copy that" is walkie-talkie talk for - I understand, will do, gotcha, ok, alright, yup, uh-huh, and much more depending on the inflection of the voice.
- ► 2007 (29)
- ► 2006 (101)
- In an amazing reversal, "frist backs stem cell res...
- blah news blah
- Good times.
- Too far.
- Bad boooy, bad Boy.
- Poor Rove
- What makes an adult?
- Chad Nicholson Photography
- sports, weee
- good or bad?
- I just played a little capture the flag - ok, I pl...
- politcs is my reality tv.
- ▼ July (15)